have read in these days of the scandal of the assumptions on which direct call to ATAC, the public prosecutor in Rome has opened a file.
Since the center-right governing Rome, more than 800 people were hired than those with no particular merit of being relatives or friends of various directors of Rome.
All these assumptions, almost all in leadership roles, as well as Poor management, have led the company to the Roman substantial failure. The recent replacement of the managing director could not improve the serious financial situation.
In 2009 it completed the integration process that has resulted in the incorporation into the "new" old ATAC SpA operating companies (Trambus Met.Ro SpA and SpA) turning in the biggest Italian operator of local public transport.
But the growth in the size of the company is paid to the growth of attestatesi losses in 90 million is for 2009 and for 2010 . All this without a business plan.
how to solve the problem?
Once again (remember VAT on Ta.Ri.? ) we thought the ineffable Councillor Maureen budget accountant Leo known as well as deputy.
With the tools of corporate law, which let you group all the subsidiaries of the new entity Capital Rome in a single large holding, thanks to the "fiscal consolidation" will spread on the public part of the tax losses.
like saying that the salary of the recommended pay all of us. Besides the insult to injury ....
An illustrative example.
Current:
Company A has an income of 100, a loss of 100 Company B, Company C of an income 10.
taxes paid amounted to 30.25 (27.5 borne by society A and 2.75 against company C)
Company B may use the tax losses within 5 years if and to the extent that produce income. By holding
:
opting for tax consolidation regime, will be the holding company to pay taxes on income (I.Re.S.) on behalf of the group, also the holding company will compensate the losses and income from subsidiaries .
In our example the "Income Group" will be 10 and the taxes paid will amount to 2.75 .
The savings that will achieve the HOLDING SARA 'COSI' DI: 27.5 .
But in finance as in physics nothing is created nor destroyed so if someone earns someone other loses.
Guess who in this case ?????
0 comments:
Post a Comment